November 07, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834522b4969e200e54f903b308834
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Comments
- Natural Health Products on Barack Obama and Abortion Reduction
- Max on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
- ChadWick on Gay? Straight? Litigious?
If there was any chance of me voting for Giuliani in 2008 (very slim to start with), this killed it.
Posted by: JoeG | November 08, 2007 at 09:05 AM
Guiliani is twice as insane, and has half the moral conscience of Bush and Cheney combined.
No wonder all the D.C. pundits and cable-TV talk show hosts are on his side.
Posted by: paulf | November 08, 2007 at 12:12 PM
He's a one-trick pony. Once you get past 9/11, there is not much substance there. The unions in NYC hated him when he was mayor over here (I live close by in CT). He was very divisive on racial issues, especially when the NYPD was involved. I would vote for an independent Michael Bloomberg before I ever considered voting for Giuliani.
Posted by: JoeG | November 08, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Yeah, out of all the endorsements flying the past few days, this is the one that is truly bizarre. The RR is more interested in keeping their political clout than saving face.
Posted by: Tony Sisk | November 08, 2007 at 12:31 PM